Archive for the ‘Phils and Lophies’ Category

on those with Double Faces

Monday, March 8th, 2010

It’s surprising how double faced people could sometimes be, and again as I’ve done in the past, here is a transcription of my dear C.H. Spurgeon (take a careful read through his lines):

EVEN bad men praise consistency. Thieves like honest men, for they are the best to rob. When you know where to find a man, he has one good point at any rate; but a fellow who howls with the wolves and bleats with the sheep gets nobody’s good word unless it be the devil’s. To carry two faces under one hat is, however, very common. Many roost with the poultry and go shares with Reynard. Many look as if butter would not melt in their mouths and yet can spit fire when it suits their purpose. I read the other day an advertisement about reversible coats; the tailor who sells them must be making a fortune. Holding with the hare and running with the hounds is still in fashion. Consistency is about as scarce in the world as musk in a dog kennel.
You may trust some men as far as you can see them, but no further, for new company makes them new men. Like water, they boil or freeze according to the temperature. Some do this because they have no principles; they are of the weathercock persuasion and turn with the wind. you might as well measure the moon for a suit of clothes as know what they are. They believe in that which pays best. They always put up at the Golden Fleece; their mill grinds any grist which you bring to it if the ready money is forthcoming. They go with every wind, north, south, east, west, northeast, northwest, southeast, southwest, north-northeast, southwest-by-south, or any other in all the world. Like frogs, they live on land or water and are not at all particular which it is. Like a cat, they always fall on their feet and will stop anywhere if you butter their toes. They love their friends dearly, but their love lies in the cupboard; if that be bare, like a mouse, their love runs off to some other larder. They say, “Leave you, dear girl? Never, while you have a shilling.” How they scuttle off if you come to the bad! Like rats, they leave a sinking ship.

When good cheer is lacking,
Such friends still be packing.

Their heart follows the pudding. While the pot boils, they sit by the fire; when the meal tub is empty, they play at turnabout. They believe in the winning horse; they will wear anybody’s coat who may choose to give them one; they are to be bought by the dozen like mackerel, but he who gives a penny for them wastes his money. Profit is their god; and whether they make it out of you or your enemy, the money is just as sweet to them. Heads or tails are alike to them so long as they win. High road or back lane, all’s the same to them as long as they can get home with the loaf in the basket. They are friends to the goose, but they will eat his giblets. So long as the water turns their wheel, it is none the worse for being muddy; they would bum their mother’s coffin if they were short of fire wood and sell their own father if they could turn a penny by the old gentleman’s bones. They never lose a chance of minding the main chance.
Others are shifty because they are so desperately fond of good fellowship. “Hail fellow, well met,” is their cry, be it traveler or highwayman. They are so good-natured that they must agree with everybody. They are cousins of Mr. Anything. Their brains are in other people’s heads. If they were at Rome, they would kiss the Pope’s toe, but when they are at home they make themselves hoarse with shouting, “No Popery.” They admire the Vicar of Bray, whose principle was to be the Vicar of Bray whether the Church was Protestant or Popish. They are mere time-servers, in hopes that the times may serve them. They belong to the party which wears the yellow colors not in their button-holes, but in the palms of their hands. Butter them, and like turnips you may eat them. Pull the rope, and like the bells they will ring as you choose to make them, funeral knell or wedding peal, come to church or go to the devil. They have no backbones; you may bend them like willow wands, backwards or forwards, whichever way you please. Like oysters, anybody may pepper them who can open them. They are sweet to you and sweet to your enemy. They blow hot and cold. They try to be Jack-o’-both sides and deserve to be kicked like a football by both parties.
Some are hypocrites by nature, slippery as eels, and piebald like Squire Smoothey’s mare. Like a drunken man, they could not walk straight if they were to try. They wind in and out like a Surrey lane. They were born of the breed of St. Judas. The double shuffle is their favorite game, and honesty their greatest hatred. Honey is on their tongues, but gall in their hearts. They are mongrel-bred, like the gypsy’s dog. Like a cat’s feet, they show soft pads but carry sharp claws. If their teeth are not rotten, their tongues are, and their hearts are like dead men’s graves. If speaking the truth and lying were equally profitable, they would naturally prefer to lie; for, like dirt to a pig, it would be congenial. They fawn, and flatter, and cringe, and scrape; like snails they make their way by their slime, but all the while they hate you in their hearts and only wait for a chance to stab you. Beware of those who come from the town of Deceit. Mr. Facing-both-ways, Mr. Fair-speech, and Mr. Two-tongues are neighbors who are best at a distance. Though they look one way, as boatmen do, they are pulling the other; they are false as the devil’s promises, and as cruel as death and the grave.
Religious deceivers are the worst of vermin, and I fear they are as plentiful as rats in an old wheat stack.

They are like a silver pin,
Fair without but foul within.

They cover up their black flesh with white feathers. Saturday and Sunday make a wonderful difference in them. They have the fear of the minister a good deal more before their eyes than the fear of God. Their religion lies in imitating the religious; they have none of the root of the matter in them. They carry Dr. Watts’ hymn book in their pocket and sing a roaring song at the same time. Their Sunday coats are the best part about them; the nearer you get to their hearts, the more filth you will Cad. They prate like parrots, but their talk and their walk do not agree. Some of them are fishing for customers, and a little pious talk is a cheap advertisement; if the seat at the church or the meeting costs a trifle, they make it up out of short weights They don’t worship God while they trade, but they trade on their worship. Others of the poorer sort go to church for Soup, and bread, and coal tickets. They love the communion because of the alms’ money. Some of the dear old Mrs. Goodbodies want a blessed almshouse, and so they profess to be so blessed under the blessed ministry or their blessed Pastor every blessed Sabbath. Charity suits them if faith does not; they know which side their bread ice buttered on.
Others make a decent show in religion to quiet their consciences; they use it as a salve for their wounds. If they could satisfy heaven as easily as they quiet themselves, it would be a fine thing for them. It has been my lot to meet with some who went a long way in profession, as far as I could see, for nothing but the love of being thought well of. They got a little knot of friends to believe in their dime talk, and take all in for gospel that they liked to say. Their opinion was the true measure of a preacher’s soundness; they could settle up everything by their own know, and they had gallons of XXX experience for those who liked something hot and strong; but dear, dear, if they had but condescended to show a little Christian practice as well, how much better their lives would have weighed up! These people are like owls, which look to be big birds, but they are not, for they are all feathers; and they look wonderfully knowing in the twilight, but when the light comes, they are regular boobies.
Hypocrites of all sorts are abominable, and he who deals with them will rue it. He who tries to cheat the Lord will be quite ready to cheat his fellow men. Great cry generally means little wool. Many a big chimney in which you expect to see bacon and hams, when you look up it, has nothing to show you but its empty hooks and black soot. Some men’s windmills are only nutcrackers, and their elephants are nothing but sucking pigs. It is not all who go to church or meeting that truly pray, nor those who sing loudest that praise God most, nor those who pull the longest faces who are the most in earnest.
What mean animals hypocrites must be! Talk of polecats and weasels, they are nothing in comparison to them. Better be a dead dog than a live hypocrite. Surely when the devil sees hypocrites at their little game, it must be as good as a play to him; he tempts genuine Christians, but he lets these alone, because he is sure of them. He need not shoot at lame ducks; his dog can pick them up any day.
Depend upon it, friends, if a straight line will not pay, a crooked one won’t. What is got by shuffling is very dangerous gain. It may give a moment’s peace to wear a mask, but deception will come home to you and bring sorrow with it. Honesty is the best policy. If the lion’s skin does not do, never try the fox’s. Be as true as steel. Let your face and hands, like the church clock, always tell how your inner works are going. Better be laughed at as Tom Tell-truth than be praised as Crafty Charlie. Plain dealing may bring us trouble, but it is better than shuffling. At the last, the upright will have their reward; but for the double-minded to get to heaven is as impossible as for a man to swim the Atlantic with a millstone under each arm.

the unSanctity of Life II

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

Before I let the subject of our right to death lie, I will share one more excerpt, in continuation from the previous post:

I hope I don’t  die,
We all, are going to die
Didn’t mean to remind you–
it’s on your schedule.
Maybe it won’t come when you want–
you never know when, how or why,
We are somehow supposed to be worried about dying,
We even talk about death often–
And the important question:
“Where do you go after?”
Do I care?
And I ponder on suicide:
A medium for those who can’t wait to find out
where we go after,
“Oh, I’ve been waiting for a long time.”
Don’t despair about where we’re going after,
Find out now and be there before us all.

I think of a top-salesperson wanting to commit suicide
the priest tries to talk him out of it
And he talks the priest into it.

At some point on earth, there where only 6 people.
Only 6.
6 people, 6 souls
they died, souls went to it’s places.
Now we have about 6 billions people
All claiming to have souls
Is someone printing up souls?
And the souls claim to have value–
Seriously?

I think about funerals
getting more flowers than I ever got alive,
People, saying all things nice
Even if they have to be made up.
“Oh, he was a mean guy, goodly mean though”
“How about that other?”
“Oh, he’s still alive, and he’s crazy mean!”

the unSanctity of Life I

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

In class yesterday I think I stunned a few when I attempted to argue that living is not that special–I pointed out that life has no sanctity. In the medical ethics class (on the topic on Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide), we where discussing the case of a man who killed his 12 years old daughter cerebral palsy who has developed extreme severity; ultimately ‘Latimer has consistently claimed that he killed his daughter, by placing her in his farm truck and connecting the exhaust pipe to the cabin, in order to relieve her suffering.’(please read the full story here) And the Professor asked we discuss the rightness or wrong of this; most in the class concluded life is too precious to be taken away.

I disagreed, with passion. There is nothing, I pointed that makes our life extremely different from those animals, bacteria or cancer cells we kill daily. You can expect that I will get more hate than I can imagine (some even thought I was going insane).

Since I couldn’t discuss the depth of the argument in this 50 minutes class, where I wish I recite this to them:

on the Sanctity of Life,
A bunch of Shit Talk.
Life is Sacred…says who?
God?
If you read history this God
is the leading cause of death
and has been for thousands of years–
Hindus, Muslims, Jews, Christians
all killing each other
‘the sword of God’, ‘the blood of the lamb’, ‘vengeance is mine’–
Millions dead.
The wrong answer to the God question:
‘You believe in God?’ ‘No’–dead!
‘You believe in God?’ ‘Yes’
‘You believe in my God?’ ‘No’–dead!
…for thousands of years
…all the best wars,
the brutal wars, the craziest wars all fueled on religious hatred.
Forget sanctity of life!
And if there is, not from God.
We, humans, made it up!
Why?
‘Cause we’re alive–self-interest
We, promoting the idea that somehow
our life is sacred.
Dead people don’t talk about this…
Why?
They don’t care, they are dead!
It all grows from our biased point of view
It is a self-serving man-made-crap
One of the things we tell ourselves
…to feel good
Life is sacred–making us feel noble.
Think of it:
if everything that ever lived is dead,
And everything that is alive will die,
Where is there sanctity?
We are hypocritical.
Think of it:
We kill mosquitoes, flies–’cause they are pest
Lions and tigers–’cause it’s fun
Chickens and pigs–’cause we’re hungry
Pheasants and Quails–’cause it’s fun and we’re hungry
People–’cause they’re pest and it’s fun
Cancer cells–where is their sanctity
Save the tumor!
Save the Viruses, Mildew, Bacteria, Crabs…
Aren’t they sacred?
Sanctity of Life is very selective,
We choose those forms of life we deem sacred
And…
We kill the rest
Why?
We made it all up.

chilled Chile, a lesson on Dying

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

There was Haiti and now Chile, guess whose fault it is…I’m guessing global warming, theologians, and academicians, I’m kidding about the academician part and the rest remains valid, global warming and theologians, faux alike.

Maybe I’ve lost my sympathy–but people are dying by the thousands everyday and the economist in me is saying: “maybe it’s a good thing.” Remember, we’re all going to die and actually that’s what makes us the lucky ones. Before I heard the news of the Chile Mag. 8.8 earthquake, I wanted to talk about the “littleness” of life, a lot like George Carlin would do. We humans are taking ourselves too seriously.

It perhaps comes to mind that I might be reacting differently if me or my acquaintance is involved in this disaster; I might, I might not. My heart goes out to those who might have been affected and for those who are not affected, I wrote this a long while ago and I’d repeat:

We are going to Die!
And that makes us,
the lucky ones.
Most people are never going to die,
because they are never going to be born.

The potential people who could have been here in my place
that would in fact not see light of day,
out number the sand grain of the Sahara.

Certainly,
those unborn greats exists.

Greater Poets than Keith,
greater scientist than Newton.
greater minds than Einstein.

We know this because the set of possible people
allowed by our DNA outnumbers the set of actual people.

In the teeth of this stupefied odds,

it is You and I in our ordinariness,
that are here.

We privileged few who won the lottery of birth against all odds

How dare we whine!
About our inevitable return
to that state which the vast majority never saw.

Prayerfully going Wrong

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Yesterday, I was imagining things and some might think I take religious hate rather too far. But let’s me share this video and you might understand a bit of where I’m coming from:

You maybe don’t see the need to watch it, or you probably did and wonder  what religion has up its selves. The point is, this strong Christians strongly believe that their recently dead [two] pastors will rise again  with enough prayers from them–reminds me something I said about prayer a while ago, …mmmm.

You are probably not convinced about my points yet, now watch this and get a decent laugh..

Imagining Religion

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

My uncle is convinced the spirit of God is using him, or is inspiring him, and helping him, preventing him from whatever has he–don’t worry, this isn’t a post about the rationality of religion; the irrationality has been discussed one too many times.

After our dinner where he couched me on the goodness of being a Christian, I got home and went into deep thought.

Can the world do without a man who walked on water, healed some sick people, cast out demons from humans and directed them into pigs, spoke in parables that most wouldn’t understand, thought he was one with some invisible being but not that invisible being, he was just his son. I know who you might be thinking it is, but don’t worry, it’s not Jesus.

This is a person I just thought about recently and I’m wondering if such a being ever existed at anytime in history. I wonder if the inquisition, crusades, or more recently (i’m thinking) hate will ever happen…I’m convinced it wouldn’t. This being I just imagined is in fact is the prince of peace, the only problem I have with justifying his peace personality is that this being’s [supposed] father is a sadistic serial killer and the soul behind persistent chaos if the book that I’m imagining might have being written about them is to be taken seriously.

I’m thinking this being would be the single cause of thousands of places where they talk about him and how awesome he is and the magical things he does; most of them so impossible to believe you need some special “thing” to accept these impossibilities–my imaginations are indeed wild!

I’m forced to think about how far forward and peaceful my ideal world is.

Again, I imagine some other being, much like the first being, except he isn’t claiming to be capable of doing magical deeds…what a relief. He however has radical beliefs I’m thinking is about to change the world he belongs–more interestingly, you either accept the beliefs calmly or violently, the ball is in your court, don’t worry, it’s not Mohammed.

Again I imagined an ideal world where this imaginary being wouldn’t have ever existed, a much freer world without any violence (how dare I imagine?),, a world where no one will be bond by wasteful and usefulness slavish traditions, barbaric? An ideal world I imagine.

My uncle might be right, being a Christian or religious might have it’s goodness after all, the bliss in ignorance.

the Nigger Black dichotomy

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

While still in Black History Month, something comes to mind: niggers and blacks.

I was chatting with one of my Asian friend a while ago wondering on my [then] upcoming visit to China (considering I’m black, consider me naive or whatever and if you’re curious on how my China trip went, you can read about it here). She at some point recalled the “thing” that comes to her mind when she thinks of black people–those ignorant fucks! I unfortunately can’t blame her after she told me how she came to that conclusion, we’ve asked for it.

The bad niggers get more publicity than the good blacks (think rap videos and Hollywood); I attempt to clarify [fore her] a few things–this was an article I wrote a while ago differentiating niggers from blacks (really?).

A nigger is the one you see and say to yourself: “thank God I’m not that fellow–so ignorant!” and a black man is that you admire and enviously desire his success.

A nigger is that who doesn’t know the difference between correctness and correct-yes, very ignorant and a black is that whose has a desire to learn and overcome challenges.

A nigger brags about his rims, his chics, his “flowz” and being tough and for the black man-he needs no bragging because his actions are louder than thousand of words.

A nigger knows the shortcut to everything and anything, no matter how crude, stupid and insane, he’s still ballin’. The black man knows the reward of hard work, he even recognizes more the fact that thousands of miles walk down a wrong road never make it right.

A black man knows, admits and corrects his mistakes, faces the challenges and move on; Niggers believe they are in prejudice.
You know their uniforms: over sized shirts and dropping pants, colorful shoes and huge “dog-ties” – that’s a nigger rolling; even if it means robbing you to acquire all this, a nigger gatta “bling.”

A black knows he isn’t supposed to do drugs, he knows he is supposed to obey the law, knows his duty to the society,  his duty to his family and does so accordingly. A nigger feels surprised if he doesn’t do drugs, go to jail or get shot ‘cuz, that should be a nigger’s life!

Success to a nigger is big rims, swags and blings. So, even if a nigger can’t afford a day’s meal – gotta big shiny rims, all’s cool. Black men knows that all that shine isn’t gold and most often empty barrels make the loudest noise.

Some situations is just out of a black man’s control and he knows there are better ways to solve the problem than blame, get violent and get victimized. First of, every niggers problem, he claims, are from white people and violence and some ballistic action can solve some issues, just plain ignorant Niggers!

Niggers breed niggers, a “nigger baby mama” has tons of kids, doesn’t know their dad, on welfare and wouldn’t stop having even some more sex – a black has a dad, one mom and a loving family-that’s the real black man.

Why get a real serious job when as a nigger you can “sling” and make decent living? A black man has an answer: as stated earlier, no shortcuts and zero jail time policy for a black man. A black man works hard, holds a job maybe two and leads an accomplished life.

A nigger thinks: being polite, honest, gentle, thrifty, intelligent or [legally] accomplished is “acting white.” A black has no idea what “acting white” means but he does know that skin color does not predict decency or, even if stereotyped as the inferior classes, that doesn’t stop us for achieving and beating the odds.

I can only suggest the differences, now you can decide when that fellow who you’re labeling a nigger is in fact one.

Love on Delusion IV

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

Today is Valentine’s and everyone’s possibly doing something or planning to. Few posts ago, I thought of the idea of love; whatever it means to you–this is how I see it, here, here and here.

All those said, this is the last of the series and I figured a better to end it is this poem inspired and dedicated to my late friend (Uduak Umo, 1985-2008). It’s funny how life works; I can write about love all day long and it dawned on me, loving is a luxury and we are lucky to be one of those who enjoys that luxury.

For times we sought to spend together
In pain and in Joy
For times we sought to understand
In low and in Highs
For times we sought to carry it on
rough tide and smooth Rides
For time we sought to think
through and through
maybe it fail and work
or fail to work
For times I’ve come to see
through it all and it’s you
For times I’ve come to know
through it all and you’re you
For times I’ve come to try
through it all and let be you
For times words can’t say
though I try
For times acts can’t tell
though I try
For times even I fail me
though I try
For times I write and words fail
though I try

I’ve come to know
it’s all about trying
or if it’s falling
there will always be
Love, from your Valentine

Love on Delusion II

Friday, February 12th, 2010

Few days ago, I wrote about the delusion of relationships and the logical impossibility of love-on-first-site. However, my claims beg the question: what gets things started in the first place? After all, you don’t know the ‘inside’ of a person on first sighting, or can you instantly figure if this is someone  you will be liking or not–let me tsexualityhink deep about this…

While writing the first part of this post, I kept thinking if is is possible in the world we live in today, for a guy and a girl (assuming they are heterosexuals), to want to discover themselves without resorting to the sexualities. Reading the last statement, the quick response that might come to mind is, “you’ve got to be gay!” This is what our society has come to, sex. It’s all about sex, you are an object and it’s all about sex.

I‘ve attempted to understand the “getting” obsession. Not just sex-wise. We only get to help people we hope will help us sometime, we give to those we hope will give us back at some point, wait…I digressed. Wait, you may say, none of these answers the question I posed originally–when is the line drawn between thinking one likes, and truly liking?

Like the philosopher René Descartes who doubted all he knows to truly understand what he doesn’t know; I’m thinking it’s probably time for some re-learning; to forget [doubt] all we know about relationships. Forget ‘Sex and the City’, forget ‘People’ magazine, forget your mom’s tips on ‘attracting cool guys’, or your dad’s tips on ‘landing that chic’, whatever is that block we have erected in our head, forget them all!

Now they are forgotten. I’m thinking we can now start examining all we know about loving. What does a relationship truly mean to you? Can you handle one? Who are you? What do you truly want, in yourself and others?

As my friend and I continued the discussion (catch up here), I told her, we lie to ourselves a lot. And it’s hard to be honest as hard as we try. I continued, we can claim to ask ourselves important questions every now and then but, are the answers honest?


I have lied to myself and as i write this post, I’m struggling (maybe like you) to start giving myself honest answers and involving in meaningful relationships.

(Photo by mag3737)

Loving on Delusion I

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

My friend recently wondered why I would think it’s impossible to [truly] like someone on first encounter. She explained to me that sometimes you’d see that guy and be like, “wow, he’s cute, I like him”. Or, for the guy, he sees that girl and likes her. I understood her point(s) and as I mentioned yesterday, this form of liking is often delusional.

Richard Dawkins made an interesting analogy explaining delusion, he explained: if a person wants to play basketball like Michael Jordan, they could from a young age start training real hard, these person is being realistic, s/he might one day play like or better Michael Jordan. On the other hand, if a person decides that wearing the same pair of sneakers that Jordan wears will make them a basketball superstar, the person is being delusional. And as I see it, this is how many of us get to like people.

We see that person we think we like and start getting to know them, sooner or later we figure, we never really like them after all; we where just lusting in the first place. We might not want to believe it but truly liking someone takes moments of ups and downs, and of discovering, and of let down and putting ups–these all take time, time many of us would care less to spend.

Maybe we should blame the fast society [culture] we are in. We want fast food, high speed internet, 3G (4G) network, sleek and fast phones, video chats–we want everything right now! And this has trained us to think, we can either like that person now or never.

Or maybe we can blame the media. They tell us how imperfect we are, or how our perfect partner should be; they ‘recommend’ solutions to fix us and he dutifully fall into the trap and set delusional mental blocks.

Maybe it is our peers, family or friends. That close friend has a guy, or a girl; they pressure us into thinking we need one too and we dutifully yield to conformity, thinking every one we come across is a  potential ‘partner’.


View in: Mobile | Standard